32.38
Reported across the tracked period.
Anonymous dealer case study · Lead scheduling
An anonymous large dealer’s data shows what consistent appointment movement can look like when lead work is sustained over time.
Documented result
32.38 average weekly appointments were reported across 74 tracked weeks. Dealer identity, media mix, revenue, and testimonial remain private.
Reported across the tracked period.
Long enough to evaluate consistency, not a single spike.
What this shows
Results should be read as appointment data, not as revenue or ROI claims. The useful takeaway is the value of keeping lead response and scheduling visible over time.
Lead work is strongest when ownership and response paths stay clear.
Longer tracking periods make the operational picture more useful.
Appointment data helps identify where marketing and scheduling need attention.
Measurement disclosure
These boundaries keep the published result specific to the evidence available.
Seventy-four tracked weeks of customer-provided appointment data.
No before-period baseline is claimed; this study reports sustained average volume rather than a lift from an earlier period.
The 32.38 figure is the total reported appointments during the tracked period divided by 74 weeks.
Revenue, closed sales, profit, close rate, return on ad spend, ROI, and channel-level attribution were not measured for this published result.